Legal Opinion

Highfill Ex Rel. Loving v. Washington Mills Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlakksoN, J.

The plaintiff was a “doffer boy” about 15 years of age, working for defendant, when the injury for which this action is .instituted occurred. He testified, in part, as follows: “A doffer gets bobbins they put on a spindle and when they get full you have to take them off and replace them with empty bobbins and carry the full ones to the winding room so they can be wound. It was my job to take them off as doffer and put them in a box. A wooden box had a place at each end to put the bobbins in, and in the middle you put the empty box to doff in. You slide the box off and put another on and go…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reid v. Hans Rees' Sons Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Hood v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Wright v. Thompson & Moseley, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Nixon v. Buckeye Cotton Oil MillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Cozzins v. Tomlinson Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Batton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Batton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Wright v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API