Legal Opinion

Oldham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1929No. A-6417PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Cotton county, Okla., upon a charge of stealing certain personal property, to wit, oats of the value of $15. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed the punishment at a fine of $50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail.

The defendant in his brief says: “There is really but one proposition that needs to be presented and that is: That the trial court erred in admitting incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial evidence over the objection of the plaintiff in error, defendant below, anchio…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RuleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Commonwealth v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Mason & Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  5. State v. FolwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michelin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. State v. RussellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Paramore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API