Legal Opinion
McCree v. McCree
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 27, 1983No. 81-1604, 82-31PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Associate Judge:
This case presents a variant of the issue that we addressed today in Barbour v. Barbour, 464 A.2d 915: the extent to which Civil Service pension benefits may be deemed marital property subject to equitable distribution under D.C.Code § 16-910(b) (1981). Here, as in Barbour, the trial judge concluded that such benefits may represent marital property, and ruled that Leona McCree (hereinafter appellee) should receive a portion of the benefits to which Matthew McCree (hereinafter appellant) became entitled during the couple’s marriage of nearly 26 years.
Here, in contrast…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Kujawinski v. KujawinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Administrator of Veterans Affairs v. ValentineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Barbour v. BarbourDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Olevsky v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.