Legal Opinion
Perricotti v. Andelman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 29, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff seeks in this action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by him when struck on a public way by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The trial judge denied the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict in his favor. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff. The only point argued by the defendant is that there was no evidence of his negligence. Other questions must be taken to be waived. The evidence bearing on that point may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff testified that at about half past two o’clock on a March…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nager v. ReidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Hicks v. H. B. Church Truck Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Barrett v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Lovett v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Mulroy v. MarinakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pochi v. BrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Campbell v. AshlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- McGovern v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Kerr v. DeveauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Spano v. Wilson Tisdale Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.