Gray Bros. v. Otto
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cedar District Court. — 3. T. Moppit, Judge. Action to recover property sold and delivered, on the ground that the purchaser was insolvent, and that the check delivered by him in payment for the property was dishonored. There was a judgment for the plaintiffs and the defendants appeal.-
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.
1‘ orvenáOT^re-163 nonpayment°odfS' check The record is in considerable confusion as to the state of the pleadings. Some of the assignments of error rest upon this part of the record. The material facts in the case are, in the main, undisputed, and the question of merit is simple. In view of the state of the record in this regard, it will be more convenient for us to deal first with *856the question of merit, and afterward with the question of pleading and procedure. •
1. Gray Brothers, plaintiffs, were farmers and stock-men. One. Claus Rahlfs was engaged in the butcher business at Durant. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bellevue Bank of Allen Kimberly & Co. v. Security National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Reed, Murdoch & Co. v. Brown Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crescent Chevrolet Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- De Vries v. Sig Ellingson & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Kirk v. MadsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Walters v. HeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Sanitary Can Co. v. National Pickle & Canning Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.