Legal Opinion
Guglielmo v. Klausner Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1969PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
This case arose from circumstances which may be briefly summarized. Seligman and Sons, Inc., plumbing and heating contractors, hereinafter referred to as Seligman, purchased from the defendant wholesaler a large can of a product known as Coatatub, which is used in connection with plumbing and heating installations. Sometime thereafter Seligman hired the plaintiff as a plumber. On May 26, 1964, during Seligman’s work in the construction of an apartment house in Wallingford, Robert Treat, another employee of Seligman, was furnished the can of Coatatub and for two or three hours applied the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. CobbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Merhi v. BeckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.