Legal Opinion
Roland Killian & Dennis Bailey v. International Union Of Operating Engineers, Resp
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 22, 2016No. 74024-5-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶ 1 The trial court dismissed Killian and Bailey’s lawsuit against Local 609 for breach of the duty of fair representation and the unauthorized practice of law as time barred. It denied their motion to amend the pleadings to add a Consumer Protection Act 1 claim. Killian and Bailey’s claims against Local 609 all flow from conduct of the union representative in the course of the grievance procedure provided in their collective bargaining agreement. These claims are subsumed in the duty of fair representation. The claims were not timely filed. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Roland Killian and Dennis Bailey…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Killian v. Seattle Pub. Schs.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
- Killian v. Seattle Pub. Schs.Washington Supreme Court · 2017