Legal Opinion
Roggenbihl v. Lusby
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 13, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 53-73PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
On November 4,1953, Cato Arvid Roggenbihl brought this petition for writ oi habeas corpus, alleging that as a result of a detaining 'order' issued by an official of the Immigration and Naturalization Service he was being detained unlawfully and without due process of law aboard the American flag vessel Malden, at Boston, in violation of his rights under the Fifth Amendment to the' Federal Constitution. The writ issued on the same day. The Malden being about tó sail on a foreign voyage, respondent Lusby delivered petitioner to the custody of respondent Nicolls at the' East…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shio Han Sun v. BarberDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
- In re KiseleffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955