Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cleveland Trust Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1970No. Nos. 19175, 19176Published

1DissentCelebrezze, Circuit Judge

The majority reverses the District Court’s finding that there was a “complete lack of any evidence” favorable to the Government. I disagree.

The estate of the deceased marshaled strong evidence as to the motivation for the contested gift. The estate demonstrated that the deceased wished to supplement her daughter’s income to enable her to continue the Wade family tradition of good works, United States v. Wells, 283 U.S. 102, 118-119, 51 S.Ct. *484446, 75 L.Ed. 887 (1931); that the deceased engaged in a lifetime pattern of giving to her daughters and grandchildren; Routzahn v. Brown, 95 F.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Routzahn v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  5. Gamble v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API