Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Leach

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 16, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The chief question presented in these cases is whether St. 1923, c. 469, is constitutional. That statute, omitting a single section immaterial to the present inquiry, is printed below.* It provides that any judge of a district *469court, except of the Municipal Court of the City of Boston, on written request by the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, shall sit in the Superior Court for the trial and disposition of designated violations of criminal law. Prosecutions for all these violations of law are within the final jurisdiction of district courts. The formalities prescribed by the statute have…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  3. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Bradley v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Moore v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API