Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Teeter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1959No. 41,295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court sustaining, on jurisdictional grounds, motions to dismiss the petitions of two heirs of decedent’s estate to enforce specific performance of a postnuptial contract entered into by decedent and his deceased wife.

Appellants, C. H. and R. S. Teeter, hereinafter referred to as petitioners, filed separate petitions in the probate court which are, for all purposes, identical, alleging that their father, Frank Teeter, died intestate September 16, 1956; that appellee C. G. Baalman was appointed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Shaw v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Hill v. LakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Estate of Teeter v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. McCormick v. MaddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. McCormick v. MaddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. McCormick v. MaddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API