Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael J. Grasso, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 23, 2004No. 03-1441, 03-1442PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Michael J. Grasso appeals his conviction and sentence for money laundering. He argues that the term “proceeds” in the money laundering statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1956, encompasses only the net profits, and not the gross receipts, of criminal activity. This proposed statutory construction is incompatible with the text of the statute as well as existing case law in our Circuit. We therefore affirm Grasso’s conviction. However, we do remand for the District Court to reconsider its restitution award.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Grasso sold various fraudulent…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Alan Masters, Michael J. Corbitt, and James D. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. GutmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Morales v. BezyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Efrain Santos and Benedicto Diaz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. YusufCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. People v. GutmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API