William Knowles and Jane Knowles, on Behalf of Themselves and as Guardians of Their Minor Son, Kris Knowles v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
When this ease was initially submitted to this Court, we held that its disposition involved novel questions of state law. Thus, we certified four questions to the Supreme Court of South Dakota. Knowles v. United States, 29 F.3d 1261 (8th Cir.1994) (Knowles I). We have received answers to those questions and the parties’ briefs in response to those answers, and are prepared to dispose of this case without further argument.
I
The plaintiffs, William and Jane Knowles, brought this ease under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), on behalf of their son,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Annamma A. Ezekiel and Al Ezekiel v. Jaime T. Michel and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Knowles v. United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- William Knowles and Jane Knowles, on Behalf of Themselves and as Guardians of Their Minor Son, Kris Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lomando v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Karen Jutzi-Johnson, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Johnson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Beverly Haceesa, Individually, and First Financial Trust Company, as Conservator for Shenoel Haceesa, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Davita Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Limone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.