Robb v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTO, I. C., Associate Judge.
The plaintiff filed the suit under the Declaratory Judgment Act, F.S.A. § 87.01 et seq., and requested the Court to define or determine such rights as he, the plaintiff, may have by virtue of two deeds attached to the complaint and made a part thereof by reference and designated as Exhibits A and B, the defendant Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company being the successor in title to the original grantee. The tract or parcel of land referred to in Exhibit A is described as follows:
"Being a portion of NW-4 of SW-4, Section Eighteen (18), Township twenty-eight (28)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dade County v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Rowell v. Gulf, M. O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Carnegie Realty Co. v. Carolina, C. & O. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Farrar v. N. C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Frederic v. Merchants & Marine BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thrasher v. AridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Dardashti PropertiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Holland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.