Rochester v. Bull
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Greenville, Spring Term, 1907. Action by Thomas M. and Caroline Rochester against J. A. Bull. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Duty of driver of automobile on highway: Acts 1905, 966. cite: Tine charge states correct principies, and if a more speciñc statement were required it should have been requested: 63 S. C., 559; 70 S. C., 492; 71 S. C., 60.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs, Thomas M. Rochester and his wife, Caroline Rochester, to recover damages of the defendant, J. A. Bull, for injuries alleged to have -been caused by his negligence. The facts are as follows: 0>n August 30th, 1904, the plaintiffs were going along the ipad leading from the city of Greenville, in the direction of Chick Springs, in a wagon drawn by a mule. As they drew near to the bridge leading across Richland Creek, on coming around a sharp curve, about seventy-five yards from the foot of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ploof v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Clark Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. South Carolina Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Ellis Ex Rel. Ellis v. Mutual Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1927
- Gue v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Vélez v. LlavinaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.