Legal Opinion

Gates v. Kilcrease

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1947No. 4881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAKE, Superior Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit--brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act, Code 1939, § 27-701 et seq., refusing an injunction to plaintiff-appellants to compel defendant-appellee to refrain from the practice of optometry. The case was tried to the court without a jury.

A brief statement of the facts is as follows : At the time of bringing this action in the Superior Court of Pinal County in April, 1944, and for some time prior thereto and since said time, defendant V. W. Kilcrease, a licensed osteopathic physician, was engaged in Casa Grande and Coolidgc,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vest v. CobbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chalupa v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Kuts-Cheraux v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Huls v. Arizona State Board of Osteopathic Examiners in Medicine & SurgeryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Kay v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API