State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
The lawyer was convicted of Driving While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, Second Offense, and the Bar sought suspension under Rule 7, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings. 5 O.S.1981 Ch. 1, App. 1-A. The lawyer objected. In State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Armstrong, 791 P.2d 815 (Okla.1990) we examined the subject of suspension under Rule 7, and remanded the matter to the Trial Panel of the Professional Responsibility Commission for eliciting evidence on the issue of the Respondent’s unfitness to practice of law. 1 The Trial Panel held a hearing,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
3Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CooleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Robert KeeleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.