Legal Opinion

Wright v. NEW YORK UNDERWRITERS'INS. CO.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 7, 1932No. 7813PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Heretofore, a memorandum opinion was written and filed in this cause. The defendant had not filed its reply brief at the time, and believing the court to be in error as to the applicable principles of law, requested a rehearing. This was granted.

The defendant invokes by its plea a statute of limitation of the state of Kansas. The cause of action sued on arose in that state on January 8,1929. By a statute of Kansas it became barred in one year, or on January 8, 1930. Suit was not brought in Kansas, but within the period of limitation a suit was filed in Missouri, but was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knight v. Moline, East Moline & Watertown Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. McCoy v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKinney v. Fairchild International, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Frombach v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Toomes v. Continental Oil CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Goldsmith v. Learjet, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API