Narambatla v. United States Department of Homeland Security
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 HARSHINI NARAMBATLA, et al., CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01275-JHC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER 9 v. 10 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 11 HOMELAND SECURITY, 12 Defendant. 13 14 I 15 INTRODUCTION 16 This immigration matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for 17 summary judgment. Dkts. # 37, 40. Plaintiffs are noncitizens1 who reside in the United States 18 and whose H-1B visas and corresponding “cap numbers” were revoked by Defendant United 19 States Department of Homeland Security (DHS).2 See generally Dkts. ##…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Navajo Nation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.