Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bodle
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company and Virgil E. Arrington, filed the above-captioned case against defendant Russell R. Bodle, tax commissioner of the City of Akron, seeking a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, and injunctive relief pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3)(A). In count I, plaintiffs claim that employer contributions by Firestone to employee benefit plans set up under ERISA, based on employees’ reductions in salary, are exempt from municipal income tax…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Virgil E. Arrington v. James A. NeusserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Diversified Ingredients v. Joseph TestaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Brown Bark I, L.P. v. Traverse City Light & Power DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010