Godfrey v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
These are two actions of tort. The first is to recover damages to the plaintiff, a minor six years and eight months old at the time of . the accident, for injuries caused by being run over by a car operated by the defendant company. The second is by the father for loss of services, medical attendance and nursing. The accident happened on June 28, 1903, at about half past seven o’clock in the evening on Dorchester Avenue in Boston. The two actions were tried and have been argued together. At the close of the evidence the presiding judge directed a verdict for the *433defendant, and the case is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hayes v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Messenger v. DennieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Holian v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Slattery v. Lawrence Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- George v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sullivan v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Searles v. RossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- Swetzoff v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Garabedian v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Kelley v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.