Legal Opinion

State v. Lordan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 31, 1976No. 7185PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant excepted to the denial of his motion to quash three indictments alleging violations of RSA 159:2 (Supp. 1975) which provides: “If any person shall commit or attempt to commit a crime when armed with a pistol or revolver, he shall, in addition to the punishment provided for the crime, be guilty of a class B felony .... The additional sentence of imprisonment hereby provided shall not be served concurrently with any other term; and no part of such additional term of imprisonment shall be suspended ....” The defendant contends that the constitutional prohibition of double jeopardy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. United States v. Eddie Lee AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Gerald Lawrence HallamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ZimaOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CarpenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. GosselinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API