Irizarry v. Moore
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.
This is a troubling case. In the final analysis we conclude that trial counsel for the appellees, Dale R. Hightower, stepped over the behavioral bounds so frequently during the three-day trial of this case that a reversal is required. That is to say that while each individual defalcation of Mr. Hightower’s might not justify reversal, their totality surpasses the critical mass that compels us to order a new trial.
The appellant, Lucas Irizarry, was injured in an accident with a truck owned by appellee, Waste Management, Inc. of Florida, and driven by appellee, Kenneth O. Moore. The accident was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Garlovsky v. EastmooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Murphy v. Intern. Robotics SystemsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Maksad v. KaskelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Johnnides v. Amoco Oil Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carnival Corp. v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Adams v. BarkmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012