Legal Opinion

State v. Stroud

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Affeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. A. W. Wilkinson, Judge. Ineormation for disturbing religious services. Yerdict of guilty, and the defendants appealed.—

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

1 *172 *16The information is laid under section 4028 of the Code, as follows: “If any person willfully disturb or disquiet any assembly of persons met for religious worship by profane discourse, or rude and indecent behavior, or by making a noise either within the place of worship, or so near as to disturb the order and solemnity of the assembly, he shall be punished,” etc. The information charges the disturbance by loud talking and laughing, without the charge that it was willfully done. It is thought that the absence of this averment is fatal to the information. In State v. Butcher, 79 Iowa, 110…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ButcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. State v. WelchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. State v. FrearSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API