Legal Opinion

Kinoy v. Mitchell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 3, 1975No. 70 Civ. 5698PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

Arthur Kinoy (“Kinoy”), an attorney, and his daughter and client, Joanne *4Kinoy1 brought this action in 1970,2 seeking civil damages, injunctive and declaratory relief, and invoking this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S. C. §§ 1331, 1343(4), and 1346. In the single cause of action which now remains in their amended complaint,3 they allege that over a substantial period of time defendants, individually and in their official capacities, authorized and conducted illegal and unconstitutional electronic surveillance of telephone conversations to which they were…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  2. Daniel Ellsberg, v John N. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API