Legal Opinion

Stettine v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mollen, P. J.

In this declaratory judgment action, we are called upon to determine the validity of a collective bargaining agreement between the County of Suffolk and the Suffolk County Chapter of the Civil Service Employees Association. Special Term in essence declared that, pursuant to sections 801 and 804 of the General Municipal Law, the agreement was invalid because a county representative, who participated in the negotiations and was a signatory in his representative capacity, had a prohibited interest in the agreement. We disagree with Special Term, and therefore…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re the Estate of BarabashNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Dykeman v. SymondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Citiwide News, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. Sterling Forest Pollution Control Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Hartnett v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Rural Community Coalition, Inc. v. Village of BloomingburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Schroeder v. Brooklyn HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API