Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Astrue

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-02571-WYDPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision that denied Plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits. For the reasons stated below, this case is reversed and remanded for further fact finding.

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Plaintiff alleges disability beginning May 27, 2008, at which time she was 33 years old. (Transcript [“Tr.”] 36.) She has a ninth-grade education and an extensive work history performing work at the light to heavy exertional levels. (Id. 36-43.) Despite her claimed disability, Plaintiff continued to work…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Langley v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Newton v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. David W. Musgrave v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Hamlin v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harry v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
  2. Valdez v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API