Richardson v. Astrue
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision that denied Plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits. For the reasons stated below, this case is reversed and remanded for further fact finding.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Plaintiff alleges disability beginning May 27, 2008, at which time she was 33 years old. (Transcript [“Tr.”] 36.) She has a ninth-grade education and an extensive work history performing work at the light to heavy exertional levels. (Id. 36-43.) Despite her claimed disability, Plaintiff continued to work…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Langley v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Newton v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- David W. Musgrave v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Hamlin v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harry v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Valdez v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021