Legal Opinion

Jones v. Waynesburg Bank

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1942No. 9016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

Ohio Builders & Milling, Incorporated, instituted proceedings under the provisions of Chapter XI of the Act of Congress relating to bankruptcy and known as the Chandler Act. Bankruptcy Act, § 301 et seq., 11 U.S.C.A. § 701 et'seq. On November 28, 1939, an order was entered finally confirming the arrangement. The plan contained the following provision: “The claims of the United States shall have the same priority and preference over claims of other creditors of the debtor, with respect to the assets thereof, as would lie against the assets of the debtor, or the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Patton Manufacturing Company, Debtor. The First National Bank of Cincinnati, Caribbean Container Company, Thechatfield Paper Corporation, Chemineer, Inc., Joseph G. Donohoo, the Meadcorporation, Smith & Schnacke, and Touche, Ross, Bailey & Smart v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt, Patton Manufacturing Company, G.L.P., Inc., Patton Manufacturing Company,inc., and Juno, Inc. (The Corporate Name Now Changed to One Um, Inc.),plaintiffs-Appellants v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  2. Klein v. GAC Ltd. Partnership (In Re Exten Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1981
  3. First National Bank v. KimberlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Park Isles, Inc. v. Alfran Corp. (In re Alfran Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API