Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Kimberling

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1969No. Nos. 18425, 18426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dated March 8, 1966, entered by a Referee in Bankruptcy and affirmed by a United States District Judge on March 28, 1967. The order complained of found that a plan of arrangement originally proposed by the debtor, Patton Manufacturing Company, had not been fully carried out. It adjudicated the debtor corporation to be bankrupt and ordered further proceedings to protect creditors under the terms of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (1964), as amended, (Supp. IV 1965-1968).

The circumstances under which this arrangement was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. People's Bank v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Patton Manufacturing Company, Debtor. The First National Bank of Cincinnati, Caribbean Container Company, Thechatfield Paper Corporation, Chemineer, Inc., Joseph G. Donohoo, the Meadcorporation, Smith & Schnacke, and Touche, Ross, Bailey & Smart v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt, Patton Manufacturing Company, G.L.P., Inc., Patton Manufacturing Company,inc., and Juno, Inc. (The Corporate Name Now Changed to One Um, Inc.),plaintiffs-Appellants v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API