Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
TAMURA, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
The majority has decided that the order can be sustained on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict but not on any of the other grounds stated in the motion. I agree with respect to the other grounds, but respectfully dissent as to the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. In my opinion the reasons given in support of that ground were inadequate and the order must therefore be reversed.
The reasons contained in the judge’s initial specification filed on May 27 which is set out below were, as the majority notes, manifestly…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.