Legal Opinion

State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Ryman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1975No. Docket 56296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This case comes to us on claim of appeal from the State Bar Grievance Board. Appellant, Judge Frank Ryman, 1 contends that the professional misconduct of executing a conveyance by signing the name of his deceased client, signing the names of witnesses, etc., charged and found by the Board was not adequately proven. We disagree.

I —Facts

On January 28, 1974, subsequent to an investigation conducted by the staff of the State Bar Grievance Administrator, appellant Ryman was charged, in a formal complaint filed by the State Bar Grievance Administrator, with professional misconduct involving the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re KapciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. PoslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of RymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In the Matter of TromblyMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. RymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API