Legal Opinion

Delaware County Trust Co. v. Hanby

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 27, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

Upon the death of the testator, an interest in remainder vested in his children. It was, however, a defeasible interest, because the bequest was to them “or their heirs.” The disjunctive “or” has the effect of creating a substitutionary bequest, whereby in the event of the death of any child before- the period of distribution, the *230share going to that child would shift over to his or her “heirs.” Fisher, Adm’r., v. Barcus, et al., 14 Del. Ch. 324, 127 A. 53. When the “heirs” take in such case, they take as beneficiaries under the testator’s will and not in right of their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of NelsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1909
  2. In re the Estate of SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
  3. Fisher v. BarcusCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  4. Magee v. ChambersCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. George v. WidemireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Henkel v. AuchstetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Pyne v. PyneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  4. Rowett v. McFarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Delaware Trust Co. v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API