Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Caledonia National Bank

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an action of contract. The defendant, among other defenses, relies upon the statute of limitations. At the September Term, 1941, of Washington County Court, the cause was heard on a demurrer to the plaintiff’s surrejoinder. This demurrer was overruled and the cause brought to this Court upon exceptions by the defendant before final judgment pursuant to the provisions of P. L. 2072.

The defendant having pleáded the statute of limitations, the plaintiff replied that a former suit for the same cause was commenced November 15, 1937, and that within one year after the abatement of the writ…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Tracy v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  3. Spear v. CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  4. First National Bank of Plattsburg v. PostSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  5. Bliss v. Connecticut & Pas. Rivers RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Leno v. MeunierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Conn v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  5. Gosnell v. WhetselSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API