Legal Opinion

Andrucci v. Gimbel Brothers, Incorporated

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1973No. Civ. A. 69-905PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

On May 8, 1973, this Court entered an Order denying plaintiffs’ motion for class determination in this case. (C.A. No. 69-905, May 8, 1973). In accord with Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 52 F.R.D. 510 (W.D.Pa.1971), aff’d (3d Cir. 1973), rehearing granted (3d Cir. 1973), the merits of this action for violation of the Truth-In-Lending Act (15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) were scrutinized only to the extent necessary to determine whether, plaintiffs had produced “a minimal demonstration that the complaint was ‘sincere’ or ‘more than frivolous’.” Katz, supra at 513. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Willis v. West Kentucky Feeder Pig Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Norlinda D. Philbeck v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc. And General Motors Acceptance Corporation,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Dixey v. Idaho First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Augusta v. Marshall Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
  4. Kurz v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Sharp v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API