Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2005No. 01-0724, 01-1031, and 01-2486Published

1DissentJon E Wilcox, J.

¶ 79. The majority in this case and in Strenke v. Hogner, 2005 WI 25, 279 Wis. 2d 52, 694 N.W.2d 296, has written a duly enacted law of this state out of existence. It is undisputed that the clear intent of the legislature in enacting Wis. Stat. § 895.85(3) (1999-2000)1 was to restrict the number of cases in which punitive damages could be awarded by imposing a threshold for the recovery of such damages higher than that which was set under our common law. However, as this case illustrates, the majority has interpreted and applied § 895.85(3) in a manner that is indistinguishable from our…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Brown v. MaxeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lundin v. ShimanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API