Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentJon E Wilcox, J.
¶ 79. The majority in this case and in Strenke v. Hogner, 2005 WI 25, 279 Wis. 2d 52, 694 N.W.2d 296, has written a duly enacted law of this state out of existence. It is undisputed that the clear intent of the legislature in enacting Wis. Stat. § 895.85(3) (1999-2000)1 was to restrict the number of cases in which punitive damages could be awarded by imposing a threshold for the recovery of such damages higher than that which was set under our common law. However, as this case illustrates, the majority has interpreted and applied § 895.85(3) in a manner that is indistinguishable from our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Brown v. MaxeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Lundin v. ShimanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.