Legal Opinion
Kuhl v. Hubbard
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony J. Cerrato, J.
In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review the 1976 tax assessment on certain real property (Section 3, Block 1, Lot 8) of petitioners situate in Middletown, New York, respondents have moved to dismiss the proceeding for want of prosecution.
THE FACTS
The above-captioned proceeding was duly commenced on August 31, 1976 in accordance with section 708 of the Real Property Tax Law. Issue was joined on October 18, 1976, the return date of the petition and notice of application by virtue of the automatic denial of all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sortino v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- 860 Executive Towers, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- McCrory Corp. v. GingoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- City of Troy v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Coburn v. . WheelockNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. Assessor & Board of Assessment ReviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Waldbaum's 122, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of City of RyeNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Airmont Homes, Inc. v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986