Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison Co. v. Assessor & Board of Assessment Review

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*762The petitioner, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (hereinafter Con Ed), filed five petitions pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, seeking to reduce its property tax assessments for the tax years 2004 through 2008. The petitions for the tax years 2004 and 2005 were addressed to the Arlington Central School District (hereinafter the District), whereas the petition for 2006 was addressed to “Superintendent, Arlington School District,” and the 2007 and 2008 petitions were addressed to “Frank V Pepe, Jr., Superintendent, Arlington Central School District.” The notices of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orchard Heights, Inc. v. YancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Landesman v. WhittonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Garth v. Board of Assessment Review for Town of RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Harris Bay Yacht Club, Inc. v. Town of QueensburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Village Square of Penna, Inc. v. SemonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Matter of Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of City of RyeNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Matter of Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of City of RyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Westchester Joint Water Works v. Assessor of City of RyeNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. Assessor of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API