Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. Horne Investment Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Chief Justice.
These actions involve the title to land in the City of Orangeburg which appears to have been a portion of the *442statutory right of way of appellants’ predecessor in interest, granted to it by the State in the year 1835, VIII Statutes 409, No. 2658. The cases were tried together on circuit and this opinion will apply to both. The defenses of the respondents included title by adverse possession and by equitable estoppel. The issues were submitted to a jury who were instructed to find a general verdict and, if for the respondents, answers were required to special…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Ry. v. BeaudrotSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Southern Railway v. HowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Southern Railway Co. v. DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. v. Limestone Globe Land Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Smith v. Southern Railway—Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961