Robert W. Baker v. Thomas R. Sard and Donald J. Sheehy. Robert W. Baker v. Thomas R. Sard, Chairman, Board of Parole
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam 1
These parole revocation cases are back on appeal after remand to the District Court for the taking of evidence and the making of factual findings as to certain issues on appeal. The findings1 of the District Court are not clearly erroneous and they dispose of most of the issues here. This opinion will therefore be limited to a consideration, of these remaining issues: whether execution of the parole violator warrant was invalid as a matter of law, and whether the Board’s failure to appoint counsel to represent appellant at the revocation hearing violated due process.
On October 28, 1955…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hyser v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Ray Earnest v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gabriel Barrier v. C.W. Beaver, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Lee C. Martin v. Dennis M. Luther, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Mir IslamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Renee Decuir v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc. v. SiglerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.