Legal Opinion

Burney v. Ryle & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1893PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Before Judge Marshall J. Clarice. Fulton county. April 29, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

The plaintiff in error, Burney, under a contract with, one Crawford, the manager of the Massachusetts Benefit Association, an insurance company, had certain rights to transact business in the State of Georgia as the agent of that association. By a written contract he sold and assigned to the defendants in error all his right, title and interest in and to the contract with Crawford above mentioned. The assignment also contained the following covenant: “I hereby bind myself to remain with the said firm of D. M. Ryle & Co., as special agent in the State of Georgia, for one year…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. National Linen Service Corp. v. ClowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. BertelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Stevens-Davis Co. v. Mather & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API