Van Dyke's administrator v. Vanderpool's administrator
New Jersey Court of Chancery
The facts of the case appear in the Chancellor’s opinion. It was argued on written briefs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Ohahcellob.
The bill in this cause is filed by the administrator de bonis non cum testamento annexo of James Van Dyke, deceased, to ascertain and settle the construction of one of the clauses of the testator’s will. The clause in question is as follows: “I order and direct my executor, herein after named, to place out, or if already put out, to keep out on bond and mortgage, in stock or in any other manner, upon sufficient security in his discretion, after paying thereout any sum that may be wanting to satisfy the debts and the legacies herein before mentioned, the balance of the moneys…
2Cited by11 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Toms River v. LevyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Rusch v. MeloshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Simpkins v. SimpkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- White v. WilleverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933
- In Re Wehrhane's EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.