Legal Opinion

Buren v. Southern Pac. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1931No. 6249PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was employed by the appellee railroad-company as a brakeman. On August 6th he was engaged in running a freight train from San Francisco east. At Port Costa the train was run onto the Southern Pacific Company’s ferryboat Solano, and was ferried across the Carquinez Straits to Beni-cia. It was the duty of the appellant to tighten the brakes on the ears when they were run onto the ferryboat and to loosen them as they were about to be run off the boat. On arriving at Benicia, appellant climbed on top of a box car to loosen the brake, and while he was standing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Weinstein v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Motor Boat Sales, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Gussie v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. O'ROuRke v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API