Legal Opinion

Peraino v. County of Winnebago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 2018No. 2-17-0368PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Spence

¶ 1 Plaintiff, Robert Peraino, attempted to electronically file a motion to reconsider shortly before midnight on the day it was due, but he failed to timely upload the motion, and it was file-stamped at 12:03 *783 a.m. the next day. Plaintiff then sought to have the motion to reconsider deemed filed on the due date based on a local court rule, but the trial court denied his request. Plaintiff appeals from this ruling. However, we conclude that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to make such a ruling and that we also lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of this appeal. We therefore vacate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Secura Insurance v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. MelchorIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. SalemIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Won v. Grant Park 2, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Village of MaywoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  2. Kilpatrick v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  3. O'Gara v. O'GaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  4. Waukegan Hospitality Group, LLC v. Stretch's Sports Bar & Grill Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  5. Davis v. Village of MaywoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API