Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 6, 2006No. 03-CV-6382LPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Nettie E. Richardson (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act (“the Act”) and, therefore, is not entitled to Disability Insurance Benefits. The Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), and seeks an affirmance of her final decision. (Dkt.# 7).
For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion is denied, and the case is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Balodis v. LeavittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Ellis v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Woods v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Steficek v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.