Legal Opinion

Igal v. the U.S. Consulate General in Johannesburg

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 7, 2024No. 2:23-cv-04160Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MUNA ADAN IGAL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:23-cv-4160 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson THE U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL IN JOHANNESBURG, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND OPINION This matter, in which the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 15). Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brings this action to compel Defendants to adjudicate her husband’s visa…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API