Legal Opinion

Castillo Marcelino v. 374 Food Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 11, 2019No. 1:16-cv-06287Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOMINGO CASTILLO MARCELINO, Plaintiff, 16 Civ. 6287 (KPF) -v.- ORDER 374 FOOD INC., TIRAN TSADOK, and HAYIM TSADOK, Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On March 27, 2018, the Court issued an Opinion in this action finding that Plaintiff, although entitled to damages, had committed perjury in the course of his prosecution of this case. (Dkt. #59). The Court invited the parties to brief whether sanctions were warranted against Plaintiff, under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 or the Court’s inherent powers (id.),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. David Warren v. Henry Garvin, Supt. Mid-Orange Correctional Facility, Robert HanslmaierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. ABF Freight System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Radecki v. GlaxoSmithKlineDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API