Legal Opinion

McWee v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 27, 2004No. 25780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BURNETT:

Petitioner, a death row inmate who has exhausted his state remedies, seeks a writ of habeas corpus contending the denial of his request for a parole eligibility charge at trial was “a violation, which, in the setting, constitutes a denial of fundamental fairness shocking to the universal sense of justice.” Butler v. State, 302 S.C. 466, 468, 397 S.E.2d 87, 88 (1990) (emphasis in original) (internal citation omitted). We deny the writ.

FACTS

Petitioner was convicted of murder and armed robbery and was sentenced to death. His direct appeal was affirmed. State v. McWee, 322 S.C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Shafer v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Williams v. OzmintSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. McWee v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Richard Bernard Moore v. Bryan P. StirlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API