Legal Opinion
Joseph T. Ryerson & Sons, Inc. v. Commodity Engineering Company, and Michael K. Whetstone
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1982No. 81-1572PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
Commodity Engineering Company (“Commodity”) appeals from the district court’s decision that Commodity had rejected certain equipment it purchased from Joseph T. Ryerson & Sons, Inc. (“Ryerson”) and that Ryerson, therefore, was the owner of the equipment and was entitled to the proceeds from its sale under S.C.Code § 36-2-401(4) (1976). We affirm.
I
In August 1975, Commodity, a South Carolina steel fabricator, ordered from Ryerson a Manco Fabriline Beamline system (Beam-line) 1 with a purchase price of $111,204.00. Commodity sought to have the Beamline installed in its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hydrick v. Mehlman's Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Carter v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1845
- General Electric Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cmi Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Leemar Steel Co., Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Amica, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In Re Wild Lilly, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- In Re DeNicolaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Reynold L. Hoover v. Osley & Whitney, Inc., Reynold L. Hoover v. Osley & Whitney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990