McDaniel v. Fulton National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
We here reconsider en banc the rule of Martin v. Commercial Securities Co., 539 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1976), that neither an acceleration clause nor the lender’s rebate policy with respect to acceleration clauses must be disclosed under the Truth-in-Lending Act (the Act).1 Our panel held itself *950bound by Martin and so holding, disposed of these appeals on its authority.2 We reverse.
We agree with Martin that a mere right in the lender to accelerate payments upon the event of a late payment is not a charge and hence need not be disclosed under the Act. But we are unable to free…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William Johnson and Joan Johnson, His Wife, and Cross-Appellees v. McCrackin Ford, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- James L. Martin v. Commercial Securities Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olga Valencia and Miguel Gonzalez v. Anderson Bros. Ford and Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Luis and Margaret Vega, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Joy Ellen Smathers v. Fulton Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Robert P. McDaniel Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Jan T. Barksdale v. Peoples Financial Corp. Of Alpharetta, James R. Barrett v. Vernie Jones Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Carolyn Pittman and Daniel Pittman v. Money Mart, Inc., of Mendenhall, Mississippi, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.