Legal Opinion
State v. Pippenger
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 10, 1986No. 13664PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROW, Judge.
A jury found Mark Everett Pippenger (“defendant”) guilty of forcible rape, § 566.030.1, RSMo Cum.Supp.1980, and assessed punishment at 20 years’ imprisonment. Judgment was correspondingly entered and defendant appeals, relying on five assignments of error. Four are presented in a brief filed by appointed counsel; the other is asserted in a pro se brief.
Inasmuch as one of the assignments of error briefed by counsel (point 3) is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, a synopsis of the evidence is necessary. In determining whether the evidence was sufficient to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Ricky Carter v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- State v. RodneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. ReyesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. SnyderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.